In this session were asked to animate 4 different types of animation of ball physics, the first being a short animation of a cartoon ball bouncing which required to draw to draw stretched circles throughout which from my prospective was fairly hard as my circles are not brilliant compared to drawing a normal circle. then for the second animation we were required to animate to real psychics of a bowling ball( black )/ a ping pong ball( yellow ) and a tennis ball( purple ). with this animation real physics were required and it took a quite a few attempts to make some form of realistic animation that was expected.
Okay Coyle - I'm just going to come out and say this because I think it's what your client is going to say: I think you risk confusing children with your film - or rather you risk children and teachers simply not recognising it as something useable for their purposes. Rumans is very close 'Humans' - which is unhelpful, because your characters are not human, so why draw similarities? Later you suggest the audience should ask their biology teacher about 'reproduction' but this reproduction is 'Ruman' reproduction not human reproduction, so isn't that another blending of the fictions of your made-up world with the facts of the real world? I need to ask a simple question I guess - when and how do you imagine a teacher using your film and what do you think are the risks of a child using your film to revise from in preparation for their GCSEs?
ReplyDelete